![]() slow down or increase playback speed with regular tone includes all the essential decoders required for media playback internal filters are not registered to user's system (it doesn't up with your system filters) support for both internal and external filters While the KMPlayer features list is very very long: It seems that you're reasons are not so many. doesn't use an installer with a toolbar Personally I used KMPlayer in the past under XP because I always hated codec packs, now on Windows 7 WMP and CoreAVC ($12) are enough for my needs. You should read this and the KMPlayer manual before going back to MPC or VideoLan. Have anyone here tried to play HD content at 1080p on a little Atom powered netbook using VLC or Media Player Classic? If not you should, maybe someday will come back here with the result and than please try the same file with KMPlayer or PotPlayer.Īnd no, I'm not saying that KMPlayer is the BEST video player around, is just better than MPC and VideoLan. It's extremely configurable, powerful and very fast. KMPlayer can play every format with internal decoders, can post-process audio and video, can play and capture TV, has lots of subtitles options, etc. Leave it and search for an alternative there is a lot of good, free stuff floating around the web like PotPlayer, KMPlayer, MPlayer WW, MPUI-HCB, SPlayer, Light Alloy, Zoom Player, SMPlayer, UMPlayer, RealPlayer Mini and the list goes on. With time, VLC transformed into a bloated, full with bugs media player. VideoLan was great because of his partfile eMule plugin (it was the only media player capable to preview eMule temp files) that's why the huge popularity. That's was about 6-7 years ago when was nothing except WMP, MPC, BS.Player and the infamous K-Lite Codec Pack that we all know. Remember when VLC was about 4.6 MB ? Or maybe you don't. I just want to explain a simple equation: We need money and in the same time we need free software, if not, tomorrow we all gonna pay $99 for a video player like PowerDVD or ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre.ĮND: I repeat myself, but please, tell me On a scale from one to ten how hard is to un-check two check-boxes? I've seen many, the FFMPEG HOS, Calendar of Updates HOS and so on, some years ago I even maintained a website where I listed p2p software bundled with adware.ĭo you know how many video conversion, video players and other multimedia software are based on FFMPEG without giving any credit? FFMPEG is everywhere, VLC uses FFMPEG, PotPlayer, MediaCoder, everyone use it so again, please stop complaining, because someone else spend hours and hours to give you a FREE piece of software.Īnd again I DON'T WANT TO BE RUDE WITH YOU, my English is relatively poor so please don't get me wrong. Let me ask you: On a scale from one to ten how difficult is to un-check two check-boxes?Īnd let me be CLEAR, I don't say that I agree with the software developers that bundle ASK toolbar into the installers like AVIRA but they need to do some revenue, right? Do you wanna pay tomorrow $99 for a multimedia player? or for a simple screenshot tool? Personally I don't, so get used with it, people need money to live, and WE, THE END-USERS need free software.Ģ. Since I worked for different big software download archives (for different reasons I don't disclose here) I can say that at least 30% of the FREEWARE software nowadays is bundled with OpenCandy, ASK Toolbar and other promotional stuff. Click to expand.Ok, I really don't want to hijack this tread nor to be rude but do you really want to talk about the ''Installers hall of shame'' and ''FFMPEG Hall of shame'' ?ġ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |